Гуглопатриотизм
Jun. 29th, 2012 06:29 pmНа /. пишут, что гугловский планшет Nexus Q будет производиться на территории США (что, и все микросхемы тоже?)
и гордо нести надпись "Designed & manufactured in the USA". Причем "они надеются, что потребитель будет готов платить больше, но не намерены строить на этом маркетинговую кампанию".
Я начинаю беспокоиться за поголовье американских гризли.
При этом согласно статье в Компьютерре разработкой занимались инженеры тайваньской фирмы ASUStek. Да, сидя в Калифорнии "для оперативности разработки".
и гордо нести надпись "Designed & manufactured in the USA". Причем "они надеются, что потребитель будет готов платить больше, но не намерены строить на этом маркетинговую кампанию".
Я начинаю беспокоиться за поголовье американских гризли.
При этом согласно статье в Компьютерре разработкой занимались инженеры тайваньской фирмы ASUStek. Да, сидя в Калифорнии "для оперативности разработки".
no subject
Date: 2012-06-29 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-29 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-29 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-29 03:21 pm (UTC)ASUStek добрая контора
Date: 2012-06-29 09:30 pm (UTC)Take the story of Dell Computer [DELL] and its Taiwanese electronics manufacturer. The story is told in the brilliant book by Clayton Christensen, Jerome Grossman and Jason Hwang, The Innovator’s Prescription :
ASUSTeK started out making the simple circuit boards within a Dell computer. Then ASUSTeK came to Dell with an interesting value proposition: “We’ve been doing a good job making these little boards. Why don’t you let us make the motherboard for you? Circuit manufacturing isn’t your core competence anyway and we could do it for 20% less.”
Dell accepted the proposal because from a perspective of making money, it made sense: Dell’s revenues were unaffected and its profits improved significantly. On successive occasions, ASUSTeK came back and took over the motherboard, the assembly of the computer, the management of the supply chain and the design of the computer. In each case Dell accepted the proposal because from a perspective of making money, it made sense: Dell’s revenues were unaffected and its profits improved significantly. However, the next time ASUSTeK came back, it wasn’t to talk to Dell. It was to talk to Best Buy and other retailers to tell them that they could offer them their own brand or any brand PC for 20% lower cost. As The Innovator’s Prescription concludes:
Bingo. One company gone, another has taken its place. There’s no stupidity in the story. The managers in both companies did exactly what business school professors and the best management consultants would tell them to do—improve profitability by focus on on those activities that are profitable and by getting out of activities that are less profitable.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2011/08/17/why-amazon-cant-make-a-kindle-in-the-usa/
Re: ASUStek добрая контора
Date: 2012-06-30 12:11 pm (UTC)